This is how Amanda Laucher puts it in her presentation that the Oslo team has just limelighted.

Is this true?

I have a problem with that: the letters don't match.

-Ciper

ps: Please watch the presentation; it is quite instructive.

In the first minute of this presentation, she speaks of DSLs and clearly says they are "domain specific languages." She uses the phrase "domain modeling toolset" to describe the whole of Oslo, not of DSLs. So there's no contradition or mis-matched acronyms going on here, nor is she introducing some new term or relationship to the picture.

.Kraig

Do you have a link to this presentation?

In the what's new section of this very site!

Front page: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/oslo/default.aspx

I think she was saying that Oslo in general might be more of a domain modeling toolset? She also said that MGrammar was more for authoring DSLs and she also said that MGrammar was the most interesting part of Oslo to her. I feel like I hear that a lot.

In the first minute of this presentation, she speaks of DSLs and clearly says they are "domain specific languages." She uses the phrase "domain modeling toolset" to describe the whole of Oslo, not of DSLs. So there's no contradition or mis-matched acronyms going on here, nor is she introducing some new term or relationship to the picture.

.Kraig